Sunday Science: You’re pretty good, huh?

If you’re reading this, you’re probably rather smart. No, no, don’t be modest: whatever your supposed ‘academic ability’, you’re on a blog about science, reading about real research findings. That means you care. I don’t know what you care about, but when I look at people, the ones who stand out are the ones who care enough to engage, read, look, think. Like you!

That’s why I feel that you’re ready for an unfortunate truth.It isn’t about politics, or media, or industry. Not directly, at least. It’s about you. Like I said, you’re clever. You think things through. However, your history betrays you. Over thousands of generations, the way you think has been shaped by countless forces. Those forces have left their imprints hard-wired into you. And they make you susceptible to invisible enemies.

Emerging from the depths of shadow...

Take, for instance, self-affirmation. It’s a concept I’ve stumbled upon recently, which seems to make sense. Basically, it goes like this: when your beliefs or world view is threatened in some way, you’re likely to respond defensively. However, if you are able to affirm another part of your world-view positively, you are likely to be less defensive in the first instance.

Let me give an example. I have a couple of closely held beliefs; say, the need for environmental protection and the idea that rock is better than hip-hop music. If someone approached me and started telling me outright that hip-hop was better than rock, I’d probably have a few stern things to say in response.

However, if I first had a chat with the person and found that we agreed about environmental protection, I’m likely to be more open about their preference for hip-hop. Sure, I might not be persuaded, but there’s a strong chance I would at least carry a productive conversation.

Put in that context, self-affirmation doesn’t sound particularly profound. It’s not just whether someone agrees with you, though. It can just be a simple reminder of self-worth (like, uh, the start of this post). However, as shown in a study by Cohen et al. (2000) it can moderate two very strong obstacles to accepting new evidence: resistance to persuasion and confirmation bias (i.e. filtering out information you don’t agree with).

There’s a reasonable amount of research on this, and some of it is quite cool. Self-affirmation is most effective if it happens before someone is challenged. That makes sense. But how about the idea that people engage in more advocacy about their ideas when they feel they’ve been challenged? Perhaps, in the situation above, I’d turn around to the person next to me and ask, “So, you like rock music, right? The Rolling Stones make N.W.A. look like a bunch of little brats.” Simple in that context, but when you look at fervent religious preachers at evangelical mega-churches, you have to wonder what’s going on in their heads!

I’m sure you can think of times when you’ve chatted with someone happily for a while, then suddenly found out they disagree with your stance on a major topic. In those cases, self-affirmation could well be at work: if you agree with some of what they say, you’re more open to their alternative positions too.

It also can inform us about effective ways to communicate. A direct challenge is unlikely to be met positively. However, looking for common ground – or simply even paying a compliment – can provide a window of opportunity in which to engage on an otherwise polarised idea. On the flipside, it’s a big part of why we are so susceptible to manipulative messages, both in person and in the media. It provides a back door into your world view that the unscrupulous can exploit.

So, having prepared you, I’ll open up the hard question now: rock or hip-hop, and why?
Cohen, G., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. (2000). When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (9), 1151-1164 DOI: 10.1177/01461672002611011

Categories: communication, Problems, Science | Tags: , | 10 Comments

Post navigation

10 thoughts on “Sunday Science: You’re pretty good, huh?

  1. Neither… Eurodance… which is pretty odd for an American.

  2. I love the way you opened out the post. Seriously good stuff. It is the perfect balance between persuasive coercion and groveling for the readers’ attention. One should learn a few things about writing from your style. Also, I love how you interweave the themes and bring out the basic philosophy of the paper in such short a post. I too sometimes write about research and tend to drone on and on (not that I know until some reader points out how the post helped their grandpa with their insomnia). And also, hip hop.

    • Yes, it’s kind of funny, I was reading the paper and thought “Hmm, this gives me a perfect excuse to blatantly flatter my readers and hook them in.” The dubious morality of this was quickly overridden by thinking “Yes, but it’s OK because I’m going to tell them why I did it later in the post.”

      I wrote most of this post, then hated it, deleted it, and ran with the rock/hip hop angle because it actually really happened to me about a month ago. After a pub chat about all kinds of things, a friend started going on about hip hop. I went home, looked up some of his recommendations and listened to more in one evening than I have in the past year!

  3. PeterT

    environmental protection – check

    rock and roll – no contest, check

    aussie rules still sucks though…

  4. Rock and roll. I couldn’t tell you what exactly I dislike about hip hop music… maybe it sounds less intelligent, or rock and roll has more of a melody. Maybe I like rock and roll because society seems to like it or maybe hip-hop is too close to rap, which I hardly consider to be music. In any case, I grew up on country, rock, pop, classical… it’s difficult to find room for something that doesn’t fit into that already pretty wide-ranging box. My sister likes some hip-hop music (along w/ the others mentioned) and I have endured it because she listens to it, but I haven’t found much that I like about it, even after prolonged exposure.

  5. Chris

    Rock for me. (Hilltop Hoods “Nosebleed Section” being the only Hip Hop I have ever liked.) Guantanamo Bay water torture could, arguably, be better than listening to techno music though.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: