“[Adults] should contain their exuberance…

…when playing on [bouncy] castles.”

I think the literature’s got it wrong on this one. I’m going to illustrate why; not via rational argument, but with the presentation of colourful, photographic counter-evidence. That’s right. It’s a bouncy castle photo-fest.

The scene of the carnage.

For the Royal Wedding, Clayponds Village hired out a bouncy castle. Awesome? I thought so. I spent hours on it yesterday, thoroughly enjoying the complete break from study. I woke up this morning sporting a broad range of bruises, a headache and all-over stiffness. Like any good scientist, I decided to see whether there was any scientific literature detailing bouncy castle injuries.

Looking very relaxed for mid-flight.

Of course there is!

Not much, though, and most of it’s boring (it’s about kids). My quick search only turned up one mention of the ways adults hurt themselves on bouncy castles. I wanted to check this against the reality of what I’d just experienced. Apparently something like 4000 people present injuries to hospitals after going on a bouncy castle each year in the UK, of which about 6-7% are adults. Here’s what Levene (1992) has to say about it, based on a review of hospital data:

“Adults were injured by doing somersaults…”

Some kind of zen state being achieved.

“diving over the castles…”

SuperMark achieving maximum points for style.

“and throwing one another around.”

Nothing could be as irresponsible as a bunch of adults.

Adults should contain their exuberance? Well, perhaps, if they want to avoid the chance of minor injury. However, bouncy castles are wasted on kids: according to the study, they typically sustain injuries falling out of the castle or falling over each other. Clearly, the adults are having more fun, and the evidence is borne out by the types of injuries they sustain.

Think of it as a proposition of acceptable risk. Considering the extremely high level of enjoyment offered by a bouncy castle without the usual responsibility of looking after small children, a small potential for injury must be accepted.

My conclusion: bouncy castles are wasted on children, because their exuberance isn’t even high enough to cause them injure themselves, except for when they fall out. Adults, on the other hand, are capable of much more spectacular and funny achievements, and it is even more entertaining when they fail because they generally only have themselves to blame. I say, the world needs more adults-only bouncy castles. They’re safer if used responsibly, and when used irresponsibly, they’re hilarious.

ResearchBlogging.org
Levene, S. (1992). More injuries from “bouncy castles”. BMJ, 304 (6837), 1311-1312 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1311-c

Advertisements
Categories: Fun Things On Land, Problems, Science, Things people do | Tags: , , , , , | 7 Comments

Post navigation

7 thoughts on ““[Adults] should contain their exuberance…

  1. I think I want one now! LOL

  2. Awesome… now I have to go find one to injure myself in.

  3. Just make sure you don’t somersault, dive or throw and you’ll be 100% OK! It’s science!

  4. Chris

    Sorry I could not play in bouncy castle with you…I have a sore neck! (Adult excuse)

  5. Pingback: Finding Me Out: Lazy Sunday Edition | David Robertson

  6. hahaha… I think you play with bouncy castle irresponsibly’ that’s why you got a sore neck! LOL.. just kidding’ well let adults play!!! a good point there’ ^_^

  7. Even adults become kids whenever they play jumping castles.
    http://jumpingcastlessydney.net/

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: