Three riotous reads

I mentioned the London riots last week, and said that my views have been represented fairly well elsewhere. Strangely enough, one is from a right-wing newspaper and the other a comedian:

Most of the people in this very expensive street were every bit as deracinated and cut off from the rest of Britain as the young, unemployed men and women who have caused such terrible damage over the last few days. For them, the repellent Financial Times magazine How to Spend It is a bible. I’d guess that few of them bother to pay British tax if they can avoid it, and that fewer still feel the sense of obligation to society that only a few decades ago came naturally to the wealthy and better off.

Yet we celebrate people who live empty lives like this.

[…] Certainly, the so-called feral youth seem oblivious to decency and morality. But so are the venal rich and powerful – too many of our bankers, footballers, wealthy businessmen and politicians.

Peter Oborne of the Telegraph wrote a scathing piece, showing that the actions of the rioters differ in their manifestation, but not moral quality, of people at all levels of society – especially the most rich and powerful. Russell Brand, writing in the Guardian, made a valuable contribution as well:

That state of deprivation though is, of course, the condition that many of those rioting endure as their unbending reality. No education, a weakened family unit, no money and no way of getting any. JD Sports is probably easier to desecrate if you can’t afford what’s in there and the few poorly paid jobs there are taken. Amidst the bleakness of this social landscape, squinting all the while in the glare of a culture that radiates ultraviolet consumerism and infrared celebrity. That daily, hourly, incessantly enforces the egregious, deceitful message that you are what you wear, what you drive, what you watch and what you watch it on, in livid, neon pixels. The only light in their lives comes from these luminous corporate messages. No wonder they have their fucking hoods up.

If you want to read about the riots – if you ask yourself why they happened, and haven’t been able to find a satisfactory answer – these are two good starting points. They’re far from the last word, but they are some of the best I’ve read.

Oh, and Charlie Brooker weighed in. It’s expected, it’s snarky, but it’s also worth 5 minutes of your time.

If preventing further looting is our aim, then as well as addressing the gulf between the haves and the have-nots, I’d take a long hard look at MTV Cribs and similar TV shows that routinely confuse human achievement with the mindless acquisition of gaudy bling bullshit. The media heaves with propaganda promoting sensation and consumption above all else.

Categories: Politics, Problems, Things people do, Thoughts | Tags: , , , | 6 Comments

Post navigation

6 thoughts on “Three riotous reads

  1. M@

    Russel Brand wrote that?

  2. The media heaves with this propaganda because people buy it. Do we really have to know all about celebrities who are famous for nothing more than being mildly attractive?

  3. Alana

    Good Morning,
    Even though I am prolly banned for life here, I do want to state that I am learning more about the sordid behavior of some of the rioters. I no longer feel sympathy for them. Most have a “gang mentality” and are rude, and even cruel when traveling around town. I detest bullies with a passion, and that is what I’m learning that these rioters do. They threaten, harasse, and embarasse good decent people for no other reason than to bully and scare them! They want to
    appear tough and dangerous, so that they instill fear in people. I truly hate that kind of behavior, and I think they should be jailed with hard labor involved! I have no tolorance for bullies on any level, and I think swift justice should be served NOW! I also think that they should be required to clean up, and pay for any damage that they have done. I find all of them disgusting! LE should let them know their behavior will not be tolorated! Maybe if people would start to beat the crap out of them, they would back off!

  4. Alana

    CNN has a great article written by a Londoner who describes many of the rioters, and how they affected his life while living there.

  5. Alana, you’re walking a fine line. The only person I’ve banned from my blog was being truly objectionable and I don’t think you are like that.

    If you keep your comments constructive – like mentioning the CNN article, or your thoughts on any issue – that’s fine, I welcome it. But being demanding and, basically, yelling about stuff (e.g. “I have no tolorance for bullies on any level, and I think swift justice should be served NOW!… Maybe if people would start to beat the crap out of them, they would back off!”) may mean I’ll remove your comments.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: